5 Questions An Evolutionist Can Not Answer
These questions are so simple that anyone with half a brain should be able to answer them. I’ve seen much better lists before that were technical enough to require expert knowledge of biology to answer. These are just lame.
- How Did Nothing Turn Into Something?
Answer: It didn’t - How Did Life Come From Non-Life?
Answer: The building blocks of life all the way down to atoms are not alive. Life is hard to define even today. The first forms of life would have been simple self-replicating amino acids. Once that existed, evolution took over and after billions of years we have the rich diversity of life that we see every day. Experiments have shown that in the proper environment the proteins will automatically self-assemble. I think it’s also important to note that the study of the origin of life is not part of the Theory of Evolution.
- How Did Millions of Life Forms Evolve With Absolutely No Evidence of Major Change?
Answer: There is overwhelming evidence of major change. You’d have to be willfully ignorant to not know this. Creationist love to lie and claim that there are no transitional fossils but there are tons and tons of them. - How Can A Watch Come Into Existence Without A Watchmaker?
Answer: A watch, being a man made machine, cannot come into existence without a watchmaker. Furthermore, this has nothing to do with evolution. - How Did Thought Come From Non-Thought?
Answer: This question makes no sense. Thoughts are a result of chemical and electric processes in our brain. Thoughts come from the brain.
September 29th, 2011 at 21:56
#4 depends on how you define “watch”, because radioactive decay is natural and one of the best “timepieces” around. Also, a watch could spontaneously occur. It isn’t impossible. Just very, very, very improbable.
Also, I just found out you have a blog.
September 29th, 2011 at 22:27
If it were anyone else I’d say you missed the point but I’m sure you’re just being difficult
Radioactive decay is to an atomic clock as a spring is to a watch. It’s not the time piece, it’s just a part of it. Therefore your analogy is false. In any case it’s clear that this question is referring to the kind of watch that is made by intelligent human beings.
And welcome to my blog
I’d probably be embarrassed for you to read any old post. This was originally a way for me to get some thoughts out of my head so I could think them through. I’m sure much of it has changed over the years, changed for the better.
September 29th, 2011 at 22:37
Interestingly, just a couple of days after I posted this article, my uncle sent me a longer list titled “15 Questions for Evolutionists.” It was not a new list, I’ve seen it many times, frequently answered by people much smarter and experts in biology but I went through and answered each question any way. These things keep going around, they get answered and answered but the Creationist act like they are untouchable, like every scientist looks at them and is completely stumped. Which is ridiculous seeing how I can answer them with my very limited knowledge on the subject of biology.